Roman Numeral FAIL
(average: 3.64 out of 5)
Loading ...
Dec.01, 2008 in
You're Doing it Wrong
Bad Roman Numerals on a Rolex
(average: 3.64 out of 5) Loading ... 
Sexy FAIL
-
Another Sexy FAIL
(No Comments)
-
Halloween Costume WIN!
(2 Comments)
-
Pole Dance FAIL (video)
(2 Comments)
-
Mommy FAIL
(2 Comments)
-
Another WTF Costume FAIL
(6 Comments)
-
Logo Design FAIL
(1 Comment)
-
Another Bathroom FAIL
(2 Comments)
-
Another Sexy FAIL
Subscription Options:
Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
December 13th, 2008 at 3:44 am
Actually that is correct convention for clocks and watches. Next time you see one with Roman Numerals, have a look.
April 10th, 2009 at 11:52 am
no it’s IV
April 27th, 2009 at 11:08 am
that is right, all roman numeral clocks has 4 I’s
April 30th, 2009 at 9:40 am
I thought the same thing the first time i got a roman numeral watch, but if you look it up – it’s supposed to be IIII for roman numeral 4, instead of IV like it normally is.
May 9th, 2009 at 4:28 am
Actually, That is done like that, because otherwise you can think it’s a VI (6)
September 6th, 2009 at 11:57 am
u all are dumbasses if u say four is 4 I’s
4 is IV
learn how to spell assholes !
September 23rd, 2009 at 8:21 pm
Well its not spelling there either dummy…whos the asshole now…