Comments on: Roman Numeral FAIL

By: ya boy

ya boy — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:21:12 +0000

Well its not spelling there either dummy…whos the asshole now…

By: LOL

LOL — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:57:07 +0000

u all are dumbasses if u say four is 4 I’s
4 is IV
learn how to spell assholes !

By: Job Bos

Job Bos — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:28:28 +0000

Actually, That is done like that, because otherwise you can think it’s a VI (6)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:40:09 +0000

I thought the same thing the first time i got a roman numeral watch, but if you look it up – it’s supposed to be IIII for roman numeral 4, instead of IV like it normally is.

By: UR A FAG

UR A FAG — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:08:24 +0000

that is right, all roman numeral clocks has 4 I’s

By: lol

lol — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:52:36 +0000

no it’s IV

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:44:45 +0000

Actually that is correct convention for clocks and watches. Next time you see one with Roman Numerals, have a look.